The strongest information in this review comes from comparing the provider’s own documents. Marketing text, terms and privacy policy answer different questions, but they should not contradict one another on essential access and storage facts.
Catalog and character creation availability
The terms describe selecting physical and personality attributes. The homepage includes Create navigation while also describing the full creator as upcoming. We cannot infer from those two statements that the entire workflow is presently available. A catalog can function even when a builder is incomplete, so a visible list of characters does not resolve the question.
If custom configuration is essential, inspect the editor before registering for that purpose. Identify which fields are writable, whether a character can be saved and whether access requires a paid tier. Our character preparation guide gives you a short definition to compare against the available inputs. Until the workflow is clear, we would prefer a service with specific public setup documentation.
Conversation allowance and reply controls
The homepage advertises unlimited free chat, while the terms describe a usage limit followed by payment, using ten messages as an example. An example is not necessarily the current allowance, and a homepage claim is not enough to remove the contradiction. We mark the exact free limit as unverified rather than publishing either statement as a dependable promise.
Ordinary editing, regeneration, branching and export were not verified from official documentation. If those controls matter, inspect them during a short trial before building an extended story. A conversation that is easy to start may still be difficult to revise. The three-turn setup check evaluates basic voice and continuity without assuming an unlimited allowance or undocumented message tools.
Privacy and deletion language
The homepage says chats are not stored and deletion is permanent. The privacy policy describes collection of user content, staff or service-provider access and ordinary retention for six years after closure. It also describes erasure requests with exceptions. These statements cannot support a simple no-storage recommendation. We preserve the conflict because it affects what a reader should share.
A deletion control in the interface, even if available, would not by itself resolve legal retention or backup handling. Request a clear explanation of which records remain and which rule governs them. Until then, avoid identifying information and sensitive personal details. Fictional character chat can still produce revealing records about the person writing it. The absence of real performers does not make those records automatically private.